Review



2392-osm-ik-angles  (OpenSim Ltd)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    OpenSim Ltd 2392-osm-ik-angles
    Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
    2392 Osm Ik Angles, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/2392-osm-ik-angles/product/OpenSim Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2392-osm-ik-angles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model"

    Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

    Journal: medRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

    Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the 2392-OSM showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the 2392-OSM showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).

    Techniques Used: Standard Deviation


    Figure Legend Snippet:

    Techniques Used: Standard Deviation

    Normalized muscle length (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the four different modelling frameworks for our participants with CP (top two rows) and our TD participants (button two rows). *** = significant difference between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles, ||| = significant difference between modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Normalized muscle length (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the four different modelling frameworks for our participants with CP (top two rows) and our TD participants (button two rows). *** = significant difference between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles, ||| = significant difference between modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles.

    Techniques Used: Standard Deviation

    Root-mean-square-differences (RMSD) and maximum differences (max diff) in normalized muscle-tendon length between the 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles (solid bards) and between the modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles (empty bars). Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. RMSD and maximum differences decreased when using the modif-OSM compared to the 2392-OSM, which was in agreement with our second hypothesis. *** indicates significant differences (P<0.001).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Root-mean-square-differences (RMSD) and maximum differences (max diff) in normalized muscle-tendon length between the 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles (solid bards) and between the modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles (empty bars). Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. RMSD and maximum differences decreased when using the modif-OSM compared to the 2392-OSM, which was in agreement with our second hypothesis. *** indicates significant differences (P<0.001).

    Techniques Used: Standard Deviation

    Comparison of muscle-tendon length from one of our participants with CP with the mean values of our TD participants using all four modelling approaches. Clinical interpretation based on the muscle-tendon length from the modif-OSM-IK-angles, modif-OSM-CGM-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles modelling frameworks would be similar. The 2392-OSM-IK-angles approach showed compared to the other modelling frameworks smaller differences between the CP child and average TD waveforms for all analyzed muscles apart of the adductor longus muscle.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of muscle-tendon length from one of our participants with CP with the mean values of our TD participants using all four modelling approaches. Clinical interpretation based on the muscle-tendon length from the modif-OSM-IK-angles, modif-OSM-CGM-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles modelling frameworks would be similar. The 2392-OSM-IK-angles approach showed compared to the other modelling frameworks smaller differences between the CP child and average TD waveforms for all analyzed muscles apart of the adductor longus muscle.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    2392-osm-ik-angles  (OpenSim Ltd)
    90
    OpenSim Ltd 2392-osm-ik-angles
    Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
    2392 Osm Ik Angles, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/2392-osm-ik-angles/product/OpenSim Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2392-osm-ik-angles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the 2392-OSM showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

    doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the 2392-OSM showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).

    Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

    Techniques: Standard Deviation

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

    doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

    Techniques: Standard Deviation

    Normalized muscle length (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the four different modelling frameworks for our participants with CP (top two rows) and our TD participants (button two rows). *** = significant difference between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles, ||| = significant difference between modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

    doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Normalized muscle length (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the four different modelling frameworks for our participants with CP (top two rows) and our TD participants (button two rows). *** = significant difference between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles, ||| = significant difference between modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles.

    Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

    Techniques: Standard Deviation

    Root-mean-square-differences (RMSD) and maximum differences (max diff) in normalized muscle-tendon length between the 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles (solid bards) and between the modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles (empty bars). Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. RMSD and maximum differences decreased when using the modif-OSM compared to the 2392-OSM, which was in agreement with our second hypothesis. *** indicates significant differences (P<0.001).

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

    doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Root-mean-square-differences (RMSD) and maximum differences (max diff) in normalized muscle-tendon length between the 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles (solid bards) and between the modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles (empty bars). Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. RMSD and maximum differences decreased when using the modif-OSM compared to the 2392-OSM, which was in agreement with our second hypothesis. *** indicates significant differences (P<0.001).

    Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

    Techniques: Standard Deviation

    Comparison of muscle-tendon length from one of our participants with CP with the mean values of our TD participants using all four modelling approaches. Clinical interpretation based on the muscle-tendon length from the modif-OSM-IK-angles, modif-OSM-CGM-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles modelling frameworks would be similar. The 2392-OSM-IK-angles approach showed compared to the other modelling frameworks smaller differences between the CP child and average TD waveforms for all analyzed muscles apart of the adductor longus muscle.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

    doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of muscle-tendon length from one of our participants with CP with the mean values of our TD participants using all four modelling approaches. Clinical interpretation based on the muscle-tendon length from the modif-OSM-IK-angles, modif-OSM-CGM-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles modelling frameworks would be similar. The 2392-OSM-IK-angles approach showed compared to the other modelling frameworks smaller differences between the CP child and average TD waveforms for all analyzed muscles apart of the adductor longus muscle.

    Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

    Techniques: